** spoiler alert ** I'm pretty sure my feelings about this book will be in the minority. It looks like it's been getting good reviews and maybe once an author has proved himself, those follow no matter the material??
I'm feeling like I could go off on 'Cloud Cuckoo Land' ~ let's see how well I restrain myself?!
Maybe you've noticed I've been trying to keep my reviews on the shorter side lately?? But that seems impossible to do here. If the message was to demonstrate how words, stories and texts transcend centuries, cultures, etc., I received it. But holy cow was it ever a convoluted, unsatisfactory way of getting there. So many questions remain about the stories.
Let me back track for a minute. This novel is told from FIVE different points of view. Yes, five. Anytime you get that many, it takes the reader more than a minute to get invested in each one. Then every time the stories alternate, it's another mental adjustment until halfway thru the book (hopefully) all the characters are cemented mentally. Interest waned and waxed for me about these characters/stories. There were times I could have thrown a few away. In the end I was invested the most in the story I first liked the least (Konstance.) But hers was also the one I wanted the most explanations about. It appeared she was involved in an abandoned experiment which brought up moral/ethical questions. Was the "ship" purposely infected so as to erase the inhabitants and not have to answer any questions that would eventually have to arise?? Because how else does a virus infect a hermetically sealed capsule?? Did Konstance's father outsmart the people who drugged them and placed them inside by saving her?? Mr Doerr has a lot of explaining to do....
I could appreciate the environmental message in the book that came with Seymours story. I seem to be reading a lot of books with similar messages lately and with the current state of our planet, I understand their increasing frequency. Seymour being upset about the clear cutting of the forest behind his home and the fact that everyone seemed complacent about it, very relatable. He had little to no guidance in his daily life and that combined with his issues (autism??) of not liking noise, being touched, etc. left him a loner. Classic recipe for trouble. By the end of the book, he's presented as having changed from troubled villain into a hero of sorts tho???
If I were editing the book, I would have clipped Zeno's whole trip to London. I mean, what the hell was the point of that?? I wanted more from Rex and well, basically more for both of them. As it was, the sole point of him being in Zeno's story was to teach him Greek. I guess it was worth it??? Same with Omeir's oxen. Did we have to kill them off just for his path to cross Anna's?? Mixed feelings about his story too except, in the end, he was the conduit in getting the ancient book from one point to another so I guess not pointless??
I just knew the stories were going to intersect into something brilliant. I mean, they had to right? Unfortunately I missed that part? Was I reading over my skill set?? Unless the purpose was to create independent stories showing a books passage thru time?? Now that I've written the question, maybe that IS the answer???
Having said all that, it remains that Anthony Doerr is undisputedly a beautiful writer. There were passages among the pages that were absolutely memorable. Like this one:
“Repository,” he finally says, “you know this word? A resting place. A text—a book—is a resting place for the memories of people who have lived before. A way for the memory to stay fixed after the soul has traveled on.”
How beautiful and meaningful is that? Perhaps read it just for those glinty nuggets and don't expect to be blown away by the book in its entirety...
Sadly, I won't be recommending this one, it just missed the mark for me.
2.5 stars